DANA POINT, CA VFW POST 9934 PROGRAMS FOR SCHOLARS
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

JACK'S BLOG


4/10/2013 4 Comments

Are villains more interesting than heroes?

Writing

BEST SELLING AUTHOR and screenwriter Andrew Klavan  and film producer Bill Whittle discussed this question on a recent program on PJTV. (I'd love to embed a video of it here but it's only available to PJTV subscribers. So, click here to view it and invest five dollars (US). That will get you your first month's viewing. It's a good investment. 
Picture
Klavan and Whittle concluded that heroes aren't as interesting because, most often, story-tellers lie about them. Klavan observed that heroes are even boring because they're always “square-jawed. Courageous. They don't feel fear. They don't feel lust. Of course they're boring. Nobody's like that.”

I had reached this same conclusion while very young. My birthday coincides with George Washington's and my birthday cakes were invariably decorated with cherries to commemorate his virtue, he could not tell a lie. Yeah, Sure. It didn't take long to dispel that notion as I began to study the real Father of our Nation. Funny, I discovered that he was far more interesting than the demigod to whom I had been introduced in school.

It was a short hop from George Washington to the truth about all the other Founding Fathers (excuse me, “Founders”). I came away with a new appreciation for them and a challenge. As demigods, their accomplishments were beyond the reach of mere mortals such as I. However, as flesh and blood men, their courage and dedication became accessible to me. Why couldn't I serve a good cause as well as they?

When it came time to write my first novel, I never considered for a moment that my protagonist should be a hero, not in the classical sense. Interestingly, “heroes” in ancient Greek legends were all demigods. No, I gave Nick Andrews a very human assortment of character flaws when I wrote Rebels on the Mountain. Now, as I'm writing a prequel to his story, I'm providing a basis for those flaws. Although I only hint that he was an abused child in Rebels on the Mountain, the prequel will literally describe that abuse. It will also describe the source of the guilt he carries in Rebels from his early experiences killing and maiming enemies on the battlefields of Korea.

Nick also knows fear. After all, courage is not the lack of fear, but rather the willingness and ability to do what is necessary despite fear. Think back over the heroes you have read in books or seen in popular films. How calm they seem even when awash in bloodshed. I can't help but laugh when I remember that the only character in Star Wars who exhibited fear was a robot, C3PO.
The lack of fear in the human characters is even more unbelievable to me than the fanciful tale of science fiction.

Digressing to Klavan and Whittle, they were challenged by a PJTV subscriber to discuss, “As story-tellers, how do you break the banality of decency in a culture that celebrates the antihero?” In examining this question, Klavan observed that the real problem is not so much “the banality of decency”, but rather that we tend to lie about decency. Real human beings have urges and what makes them decent is the restraint they exhibit in not succumbing to them, whereas villains do. (As I said, this program is well worth the price, especially for writers.)

Klavan went on to discuss one of America's favorite story lines, wherein the villain evolves into a hero. (Well, a sort of low-grade, nickel-plated hero.) I could not help but agree with Bill Whittle who cited the example of Al Swearengen from the TV series Deadwood. Here is a saloon owner, a murderer, a pimp of the vilest sort, who begins to display signs of humanity as the series progresses. One scene stands out in my memory, wherein Swearengen assists the suicide of a preacher who is suffering greatly. He cradles the man, almost as a father comforting his child, as he smothers him and whispers, “Go now, brother”. 
These are the moments in stories that make them great.

Swearengen's foil, the protagonist, Marshall Seth Bullock also frequently succumbs to his baser urges. Although Bullock is more often motivated by righteous indignation, he is little more decent than Swearengen. 

No boring characters in Deadwood, that's for certain. Likewise, I have attempted to preclude any boring characters from Rebels on the Mountain.
4 Comments
Caleb Pirtle link
4/11/2013 01:51:58 am

I couldn't agree more, Jack. Heroes are only as interesting as villains when they are rogues, filled with flaws, doubts, and failures. No one believes that a perfect hero is perfect. Look at the James Bond movies. The villains are the ones you remember most.

Reply
Jack Durish
4/11/2013 04:15:56 am

Excellent choice for an example of the impossible hero, James Bond. Of course, I believe that his greatest appeal was to sexually insecure men who wished they were him.

Reply
Scott Bury link
4/11/2013 12:44:35 pm

Flawed characters are more believable, because no one knows ANYONE without flaws! There is a very interesting post on this them in the Guild of Dreams blog, http://fantasycollective.wordpress.com. For example, the hero in my novel, The Bones of the Earth, is autistic. But he's a very nice person.

Reply
Jack Durish
4/11/2013 03:11:10 pm

Your "hero" is flawed. Mine is "broken". Both are good story telling devices to build believable and interesting characters.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    More than 500 postings have accumulated since 2011. Some categories (listed below) are self explanatory, others require some explanation (see below):

    Categories

    All America Army Life Blogging Cuba Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 2016 Entrepreneurs Food Good Reads History Humor Infantry School In The News Korea Middle East Oh Dark Thirty Opinion Sea Scouts Short Story Sponsored Survey Technology Television Terrorism Today's Chuckle Veterans Vietnam Writing

    Explanations

    • ​Blogging: Commentary on the art and science of maintaining a successful website/weblog​
    • Cuba: History of the island and its people gathered while writing my novel, Hatuey's Ghost
    • Good Reads: Book reviews and interviews with current authors
    • Infantry School: A journal of my experiences in Basic Combat Training, Advanced Infantry Training, and Infantry Officer Candidate School in preparation to going to war in Vietnam.
    • Oh-dark-thirty: Random thoughts that wake me up in the middle of the night​
    • Opinion: I am not a member of any organized (or disorganized) political party. My views tend to be libertarian. 
    • Sea Scouts: A journal of my experiences as man and boy with this branch of Boy Scouting (probably not what you'd expect)
    • ​Today's Chuckle: Comics and jokes "borrowed" from other sources with links and thanks to the owners of the originals
    • Vietnam: A journal of my experiences and observations of the Vietnam War while assigned to the 9th Infantry Division, 1967 to 1968
    • Writing: Personal observations on the craft of writing and the current condition of the publishing industry
Banner photo and portrait by
  Mark Jordan Photography

Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Jack Durish All rights reserved
Web Hosting by iPage