DANA POINT, CA VFW POST 9934 PROGRAMS FOR SCHOLARS
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

JACK'S BLOG


6/25/2012 12 Comments

Does Abraham Lincoln give you the “creeps?”

Opinion

Seriously. I read a review of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, the movie and the book, and the author wrote, “I would give Seth Grahame-Smith’s Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter 5 stars just for freshness alone. I mean, Abe Lincoln killing vampires? Yeah, that could have gotten real corny, real quick. It didn’t.”
Picture
To be fair, I believe de gustibus non est disputandum [Latin: To each their own]. However, the next paragraph of the review gave me the creeps.

“There has always been something creepy about Abe Lincoln. His life was marred by tragedy, his wife was obsessed with the occult, and he was freakishly tall and gangly [sic]. This book centers his creepiness in a way that any history buff can appreciate; Grahame-Smith 'vamps' up the real life events of Lincoln’s life in a big way. Not only does he 'revamp' Lincoln’s personal history, he rethinks America’s! After reading this, you’ll forever perceive slavery in a different light. A darker light.”

This struck me wrong on several levels and I'm probably going to upset more than a few readers as I explain. So, hang on. It's going to be a bumpy ride.

Abraham Lincoln is only creepy to a child who hasn't been taught history properly. Yes, his life was marred by tragedies, not the least of which was his wife's odd behavior. She also came close to bankrupting the family with her extravagant purchases in New York, ostensibly compensating for those other tragedies that she and her husband shared. Lincoln, on the other hand, somehow found the inner strength to console others with his compassion and humor. I suppose that could sound creepy to someone who might be narcissistic.

Lincoln also had an uncanny ability to inspire the best in others. A young man whom Lincoln saved from the gallows for sleeping on guard duty following the Union rout at the First Battle at Manassas (Bull Run), went on to sacrifice his life heroically while saving others at a later battle. With his dying breath he begged for his comrades to inform Lincoln that he repaid his debt. I suppose that would sound creepy to someone who didn't understand the true meaning of valor and self-sacrifice to a higher cause.

Abraham Lincoln might also sound creepy to someone who hasn't been taught to revere their country. After all, it was Lincoln alone who championed the cause of keeping the nation whole. His cabinet was unanimous in their opinion that the South should be allowed to secede. Of course, had they had their way, there would have been no “arsenal of democracy” to help free nations defeat fascism and communism in the Twentieth Century. There would be no free world to lead the fight against terrorism and religious fanaticism in the Twenty-First Century. I suppose that sounds creepy to an intellectual who believes that there is nothing special or exceptional about the United States.
Picture
Ultimately, I am left to wonder why anyone, any woman would want to “revamp” Lincoln. The only plausible explanation I can come up with is that the author of this review is like one of the girls I knew in high school who liked the bad boys. My wife complains bitterly when I mention this. She wasn't one of them. But there were many girls who liked the boy who appeared dangerous. Anthropologists have hypothesized that females are attracted to dangerous males based on primitive desires to feel safe protected by such a man. That seems like a reasonable explanation for the behavior of primitive peoples. By extension, this may explain the current fascination with vampires who are, after all, the ultimate bad boys. However, there are more, like my wife, who understand that primitive behaviors don't necessary succeed in a modern world.

In an episode of Modern Family, ABC's popular sitcom, Alex Dunphy, the smart daughter, entices a group of geeks to do her a favor by flaunting her femininity. Haley Dunphy, the sexy sister who is attracted to stereotypically virile though dumb men, is taken aback that Alex can manipulate boys. Alex explains, “One day, your boyfriends will be working for my boyfriends.” Yes, it may be creepy to consider that brains will win over brawn, even vampire brawn.

Which brings me to the creepiest part of the review that set off this rant. 

“In some places, this book is scarily convincing. Seriously, that gut feeling that Honest Abe was up to no good in his downtime will only intensify once you finish reading. It may not have been vampires, but *something* just might have been going down in the White House.”

“Scarily convincing?” Are you kidding? News Flash: Vampires are not real! 

“...something just might have been going down in the White House?” Well yes, as a matter of fact. Starlets were going down under John Kennedy. Interns were going down under Bill Clinton. The economy is going down under Barack Obama.

But, for the love of all that is decent, let us revere the memory of one of the few good men to occupy the White House. If your teachers failed to teach you that lesson, I can recommend a few good books.

Oh, and as must be obvious to anyone who follows this blog, I am a history buff and no, I don't appreciate anyone's attempt to “revamp” Lincoln, nor do I need the metaphor of vampires to understand that slavery was and is an evil practice.
12 Comments
T
6/25/2012 03:17:06 pm

Three points:

1.) She is not anti-Abe Lincoln. It's a review of a piece of fiction. One can joke about a historical / public figure or make comments about them (as you have done with Kennedy, Clinton and Obama) without being anti-American. Come on.

2.) Again, she was reviewing a work of fiction. Everyone knows vampires aren't real. You don't need to belittle her intelligence or call her names. Not only is that immature, but it completely devalues any point that you may have.

3.) Finally, you are taking her opinion of Lincoln a little too personally. He was, in my opinion, a great president. However, that does not make him Jesus Christ. I doubt Lincoln would have liked your description of him as this kind of demi-god. He was a person, like everyone else, with flaws. It is not un-American to speculate about those flaws, and it is certainly not deserving of this response.

Just for the record - I think most of the Presidents are pretty creepy in their own way. "Creepy" is not necessarily a dirty word. However, insinuating that a young woman is unintelligent and primitive based on one blog post is shameful and in very poor taste.

Reply
Jack Durish link
6/25/2012 05:28:04 pm

I rarely respond to comments. I've had my say. It's your turn. However, this, unlike my posting, is a personal attack. So, I get to respond.

1. I did not say that "she" (whoever "she" is) is "anti-Lincoln." However, I did correctly quote the review in which the author said that they considered Lincoln "creepy." That's a fact, and it is a rather immature statement to make.

2. I did correctly quote the reviews author in saying that it was "convincingly scary." I'm sorry that I am not convincingly scared by bogey men who do not exist. I'm sorry if the author of this comment is offended by my personal preferences.

3. There is a direct implication in the quoted review that something (maybe not vampires) was "going down at the White House during Lincoln's presidency. It is safe to infer that the author was speculating that something equally sinister or evil was involved ("maybe not vampires, but"). Well, I mentioned demonstrable truths about three Presidents as opposed to the author's inference that is demonstrably not true and this "commenter" castigates me? I'm not even going to touch the "Jesus Christ" reference. I never mentioned him and don't see why you had to.

Finally, I took care to not name the author of the review in question or provide a link to the review because, yes, I have inferred that such comments as were posted in the review did give me reasonable grounds for challenging his/her knowledge of the person she chose to denigrate, and if those denigrating comments were made with true knowledge of Lincoln, then that person's judgment should be subject to question.

So, here's the invitation. Come back and comment again. I can't make anyone identify themselves but anonymity does tend to deflate your aspersions.

Reply
T
6/26/2012 03:29:58 am

Listen, it is absolutely not my intention to attack you personally. If you took anything from my first comment as a personal attack, I truly do apologize. However, I cannot help but disagree with the way you chose to respond to her. Yes, “her”, as you do mention her gender in paragraph 8: “Ultimately, I am left to wonder why anyone, any woman would want to “revamp” Lincoln. The only plausible explanation I can come up with is that the author of this review is like one of the girls I knew in high school who liked the bad boys.”

This is particularly why I felt the need to comment. You continually make reference to this author, who, after reading just one blog post, you have decided is unfit to have an opinion on a historical figure. You repeatedly chastise her, using her age and gender as imperfections. Examples of this: “Abraham Lincoln is only creepy to a child who hasn't been taught history properly.” (p. 5) “Abraham Lincoln might also sound creepy to someone who hasn't been taught to revere their country.” (p. 7) “If your teachers failed to teach you that lesson, I can recommend a few good books.” (p. 14) You can certainly disagree with someone, you can reject their reasoning, and you can renounce their strategies. You don’t have to call them a child in the process, say they are un-patriotic or assume their mating preferences to get your point across. It’s insulting and unfair to the author and detrimental to your argument as a whole. Attack ideas, not people.

As for your assertion that you correctly quoted the reviewer, you are correct. You did reproduce her writings on your blog as they were written on hers. However, the statements were taken out of context. I say this because, as you admit, you did not publish any link to the original work. In doing so, you prevented a fair judgement of her work. By merely referencing some “author” in the abstract, you fail to give proper credence to her work; you decided to write an entire post about her and her opinions without giving your readership the opportunity to judge the original work for themselves. That, to me, at least, is dishonest. In all fairness, you should post a link or her name. Responding so directly to another writer’s blog without disclosing either the name of that author or a link to the original piece is gossipy, especially when you have quoted large parts of her post and have made statements about the author’s person.

As for “identifying” myself, I wasn’t exactly hiding anything by posting under an initial. However, if putting a name to a comment is truly important to you, I’ll give you my Twitter handle, although I can’t see how that would make my argument any more relevant.

Jack Durish link
6/26/2012 04:12:55 am

I'm not sure how this "reply" will be displayed inasmuch as my blog apparatus does not allow for more than three levels of response in a discussion thread. So let me begin by observing that this is in response to "T's" assertion that he/she was not attacking me personally after saying that my blog post was "shameful and in poor taste."

First of all, no apologies necessary. A good controversy like this boosts website traffic by approximately 50%. I should thank you.

Secondly, I don't "like" anonymous posts because I have read too many discussion threads on the Internet where people will make the most outlandish assertions from behind the guise of anonymity, things that they wouldn't otherwise say.

Third, you continue to make assumptions that aren't true. I never once specified the "her" anywhere in my post. I was speaking generically of the type of person who might have said those things which I find objectionable. And, incidentally, I have read many posts written by the unnamed author, all of which have been intelligent, mature, and reasonable.

My dander rose on this particular posting and it allowed me to address causes which I have long stewed over, particularly the poor performance of educational institutions in America. This connection is too convoluted to explain in this response and will the the topic of another blog post.

Caleb Pirtle link
6/26/2012 01:40:23 am

Apparently, the only vampires that Lincoln missed were holed up in the house of Mary Surratt. He should have known that bats and particularly vampires were bad to hang around Ford's Theater.

Reply
T -> @AlaynaTea
6/26/2012 06:33:46 am

Okay. In every discussion there comes a point in which the two parties involved will never come to a consensus, will never agree and will never be persuaded. I think we've reached that point.

I honestly hope you will post a link to her blog post on this page for the simple reason that you used quoted material of another author's work without citation. It's unethical to use another person's words, in any way, without giving proper recognition of that source.

My grandmother had this really great saying: "We will, throughout our entire lives, only be able to truly convince about 5 or so people. The rest is just practice." In any case, thanks for the warm-up.

Reply
Jack Durish link
6/26/2012 06:51:50 am

Yes, I share your opinion that we will simply have to agree to disagree.

Now, as to the "charge" of plagiarism. Since it is not a crime, we have to look at it from two points of view.

Did I commit a moral wrong? Well, for one thing I have not represented her words as my own. Indeed, I think it's perfectly clear that I wouldn't want those words attributed to me. Thus I used quotes to indicate that they were taken from another source. I believe I would have been morally wrong to have provided the identity of the author which might then cause embarrassment inasmuch as I have been extremely critical of those words, I will not go out of my way to focus that criticism on her personally by attributing them to their source. But for all this discussion, readers may assume that I am referring to a hypothetical person who might have written the material that I find offensive.

Have I violated any copyright law. Well, generally, copyright law allows quotations of excerpts of published matter for critical review. I think that about covers it.

Reply
Wendy link
6/27/2012 10:10:57 am

I found myself agreeing with your opinion of this film, Jack. There is nothing "creepy" about the president that saved our union and who is revered as one of the greatest presidents our nation has known. When I first heard the concept of this film, I had to smile because it was simply so outrageous, however I find that I have not gone to see the film and most of the reviews I've read about it have panned it. Perhaps, being a student of history myself, I simply see things in a different light than others.

Reply
Jack Durish link
6/27/2012 10:48:27 am

I guess I didn't make myself clear. I have no problem with the film and book nor with someone liking them. You'll note that I began by saying "To each their own." (And I'll never express myself in Latin again.) It was the reviewer's comments having nothing to do with the film but rather their personal estimation of Lincoln as a "creepy" person that set me off on my rant.

I'll address the impact of education in a later blog post.

Reply
Josh C TwoFifteen link
7/8/2012 06:22:42 pm

On a completely random note,and for no reason other than i thought an abe lincoln mask was creepy,i started wearing this abraham lincoln mask a couple years ago and started acting like a puppet or serial slasher.Well it kind of took off and now its become a staple of mine.I have even sold masks and played shows in front of others wearing the abe masks.I have been to Vegas and walked the old strip in the mask scaring people.They tipped me and took photos,while others ran in terror.I have also done this in Milwaukee at a few places.Eventually this whole Creepy Abe thing is going to become a phenomonem,that i can say i started back in 2009.You can see footage on the website i listed.Anyways,thought i'd share.

Reply
Jeff Guckert
4/2/2013 03:07:58 am

Lincoln was always creepy. Guy killed thousands over a bloodless secession which was not an act of war.

Reply
Jack Durish
4/2/2013 06:18:03 am

The Civil War was fought over a "bloodless secession"? You have a lot of study ahead of you if you have any ambition of learning the truth. Secession could have been decided in courts and public debate had the forces of the South not fired the first shots. Furthermore, the South shed the first blood. The shameful institution of slavery cost thousand of lives and untold human misery long before the armies of the North and South engaged in battle. Those who argue that the Civil War was fought over States Rights simply have no basis to their arguments. It was a war over slavery, and they declared it so in their articles of secession.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    More than 500 postings have accumulated since 2011. Some categories (listed below) are self explanatory, others require some explanation (see below):

    Categories

    All America Army Life Blogging Cuba Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 2016 Entrepreneurs Food Good Reads History Humor Infantry School In The News Korea Middle East Oh Dark Thirty Opinion Sea Scouts Short Story Sponsored Survey Technology Television Terrorism Today's Chuckle Veterans Vietnam Writing

    Explanations

    • ​Blogging: Commentary on the art and science of maintaining a successful website/weblog​
    • Cuba: History of the island and its people gathered while writing my novel, Hatuey's Ghost
    • Good Reads: Book reviews and interviews with current authors
    • Infantry School: A journal of my experiences in Basic Combat Training, Advanced Infantry Training, and Infantry Officer Candidate School in preparation to going to war in Vietnam.
    • Oh-dark-thirty: Random thoughts that wake me up in the middle of the night​
    • Opinion: I am not a member of any organized (or disorganized) political party. My views tend to be libertarian. 
    • Sea Scouts: A journal of my experiences as man and boy with this branch of Boy Scouting (probably not what you'd expect)
    • ​Today's Chuckle: Comics and jokes "borrowed" from other sources with links and thanks to the owners of the originals
    • Vietnam: A journal of my experiences and observations of the Vietnam War while assigned to the 9th Infantry Division, 1967 to 1968
    • Writing: Personal observations on the craft of writing and the current condition of the publishing industry
Banner photo and portrait by
  Mark Jordan Photography

Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Jack Durish All rights reserved
Web Hosting by iPage