DANA POINT, CA VFW POST 9934 PROGRAMS FOR SCHOLARS
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
  • Home
  • Books...
    • The Accidental Spy
    • The Reluctant Spy
    • The Last Spy
    • Infantry School >
      • Except from Combat Training
    • Vietnam >
      • Excerpt from A Soldier's Journal
  • Short Stories
  • Jack's BLOG
  • Contact the author
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

JACK'S BLOG


11/12/2012 4 Comments

Politics may be the art of compromise, but is compromise always possible?

Cuba

THEODORE ROOSEVELT BLAMED Cuba's failure to succeed at self-rule on their inability to compromise. He sent a detachment of Marines to guard the island's national treasury while the government sorted itself out. Thus, began another thirty years of American paternalism in the Caribbean.
Picture
President Theodore Roosevelt
Cuba's first President, Tomas Estrada Palma, attempted to lead the island through the transition from a Spanish colony to independence. However, he would begin a pattern that repeated itself through the decades up to and including the presidency of Fidel Castro. Once in power, they all wanted to remain in power. The people, more comfortable following a strong man than governing themselves, were inclined to allow them. However, others wanted the power and refused to accept the will of the people, threatening revolution if they didn't get their way.

As Palma's first term in office drew to an end, two other parties advanced candidates: The National and the Republican. When Palma announced that he was going to seek a second term, these two coalesced into a Liberal alliance and announced that they would not accept Palma's reelection. They proclaimed that they would not accept the results of an election that favored Palma and would resort to revolution to overthrow his government.
Picture
Cuban President Tomas Estrada Palma
The Liberals made good on their threat when Palma was reelected and the President employed the military to break the revolt. The Liberals responded with accusations that Palma had pilfered public funds to finance his campaign and, since reelection, hiring guerrilla assassins.

Theodore Roosevelt saw this as a failure of the Cubans to compromise which he held as essential to the effective functioning of government. Is it, really? He urged the Cuban Congress to intervene, but this only caused Palma to resign. As he left office, every member of his cabinet, the ones that were part of the succession of power in Cuba, resigned with him. Moderate supporters of Palma in the Congress refused to attend sessions and, thus, a quorum was prevented. The island was left without a government.

Thus, all of America's efforts to prepare the islanders for self-rule failed. Roosevelt blamed the failure on their inability to compromise. Is that why America's efforts to build new nations in Iraq and Afghanistan failed? Is it possible that compromise just isn't possible in some places or situations?
4 Comments
Claude Nougat link
11/12/2012 07:00:25 pm

Interesting post, Jack, I always love your Cuban history posts! And I agree with you: the art of compromise is certainly an art and it has to be learned. It takes time. So yes, I'm sure you're right, compromise is difficult in some countries for cultural and historical reasons.

On the other hand, should another country ever try to "guide", or push another country into democracy? America thinks it can do that, unfortunately, in spite of all the good will and good intentions, efforts like these just seem to backfire, don't they? They sure backfired in Iraq. But there was an additional reason for the failure: American forces did away with the Baath party - it was right to do away with the bosses, but not the whole structure. For example, they did away with University teachers too (Sadam's system had requried of everyone that they join the party so to keep their job they did even though most of them were certainly not Saddam supporters!)

So, to interfere in another country's social structures is very dangerous and difficult. It has to be done with utmost care so as not to bring down along with the bad what was good...

Reply
Jack Durish
11/13/2012 03:52:34 am

I think that the larger question is this: Why does the United States champion democracy? We're not a democracy.

Reply
Caleb Pirtle link
11/13/2012 12:11:38 am

I fear that the art of compromise has been lost. In Washington today, compromise means: "You come over to my side so I won't have to come over to yours." And neither side will agree to meet half way in a winner-take-all political world.

Reply
Jack Durish
11/13/2012 03:54:03 am

I'm going to write a blog post on compromise. I'm not sure it is such a good thing. I guess I'll have to research it and think it through.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    More than 500 postings have accumulated since 2011. Some categories (listed below) are self explanatory, others require some explanation (see below):

    Categories

    All America Army Life Blogging Cuba Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 2016 Entrepreneurs Food Good Reads History Humor Infantry School In The News Korea Middle East Oh Dark Thirty Opinion Sea Scouts Short Story Sponsored Survey Technology Television Terrorism Today's Chuckle Veterans Vietnam Writing

    Explanations

    • ​Blogging: Commentary on the art and science of maintaining a successful website/weblog​
    • Cuba: History of the island and its people gathered while writing my novel, Hatuey's Ghost
    • Good Reads: Book reviews and interviews with current authors
    • Infantry School: A journal of my experiences in Basic Combat Training, Advanced Infantry Training, and Infantry Officer Candidate School in preparation to going to war in Vietnam.
    • Oh-dark-thirty: Random thoughts that wake me up in the middle of the night​
    • Opinion: I am not a member of any organized (or disorganized) political party. My views tend to be libertarian. 
    • Sea Scouts: A journal of my experiences as man and boy with this branch of Boy Scouting (probably not what you'd expect)
    • ​Today's Chuckle: Comics and jokes "borrowed" from other sources with links and thanks to the owners of the originals
    • Vietnam: A journal of my experiences and observations of the Vietnam War while assigned to the 9th Infantry Division, 1967 to 1968
    • Writing: Personal observations on the craft of writing and the current condition of the publishing industry
Banner photo and portrait by
  Mark Jordan Photography

Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Jack Durish All rights reserved
Web Hosting by iPage